What are the mechanisms that construct our experience of reality?
The role of the inferior frontal cortex in resolving sensory ambiguity.
Overview
Sensory information is often noisy, incomplete, and ambiguous. Yet the brain usually constructs a coherent experience of reality. My research asks how higher-order regions, particularly the inferior frontal cortex (IFC) and the anterior insula, help resolve ambiguity in perception and update our internal model of the world.
Key Findings
1. The IFC supports perceptual updating
Across experiments with ambiguous visual stimuli, the IFC emerged as a key region for switching between competing interpretations. When we temporarily disrupted IFC activity using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), perceptual transitions slowed. This suggests that the IFC contributes causally to updating conscious experience under uncertainty.
2. The insula signals violated expectations
The anterior insula, together with the IFC, responded strongly when events deviated from spatial or temporal expectations. This pattern suggests that the insula helps detect prediction failures and trigger the adjustments needed to keep perception aligned with the environment.
3. Damage to IFC reduces perceptual flexibility
In stroke patients with damage to the IFC, spontaneous shifts in perception during ambiguous tasks were reduced. This supports the idea that intact frontal circuitry is important for keeping perception flexible rather than fixed.
Methods
To address these questions, we combine:
Behavioral experiments using ambiguous visual stimuli.
Functional MRI (fMRI) to measure brain activity linked to prediction errors.
Brain stimulation (TMS) to test causal effects of IFC perturbation.
Lesion studies in stroke patients with localized IFC damage.
Implications
These findings support predictive processing accounts in which the brain continuously compares sensory input with internal predictions. They also suggest that the IFC is not merely correlated with perceptual changes, but helps implement them. More broadly, this work may inform interventions for disorders marked by overly rigid or unstable perceptions.
Future Directions
Looking ahead, we plan to:
Develop real-time methods to track prediction errors and perceptual updates.
Explore targeted stimulation approaches to enhance or restore perceptual flexibility.
Extend this framework to memory, belief updating, and related forms of inference.
Weilnhammer, Veith, Merve Fritsch, Meera Chikermane, Anna-Lena Eckert, Katharina Kanthak, Heiner Stuke, Jakob Kaminski, and Philipp Sterzer. “An Active Role of Inferior Frontal Cortex in Conscious Experience.” Current Biology 31, no. 13 (July 12, 2021): 2868–2880.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.043
Weilnhammer, Veith, Karin Ludwig, Guido Hesselmann, and Philipp Sterzer. “Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Perceptual Transitions in Bistable Perception.” The Journal of Neuroscience 33, no. 40 (October 2, 2013): 16009–15. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1418-13.2013
Weilnhammer, Veith, Heiner Stuke, Guido Hesselmann, Philipp Sterzer, and Katharina Schmack. “A Predictive Coding Account of Bistable Perception – A Model-Based fMRI Study.” PLOS Computational Biology 13, no. 5 (May 15, 2017): e1005536. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005536
Weilnhammer, Veith, Heiner Stuke, Philipp Sterzer, and Katharina Schmack. “The Neural Correlates of Hierarchical Predictions for Perceptual Decisions.” The Journal of Neuroscience 38, no. 21 (May 23, 2018): 5008–21. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2901-17.2018